Skip to main content

Backlog

29

Under consideration

Feature Request

Add dark mode

As someone who is going to spend a lot of time in front of this screen, I definitely believe that having a dark mode is essential. Spending extended periods of time looking at bright, glaring light can lead to eye strain and discomfort, which can affect productivity.

Usman Yousaf
Feature Request

The product is very promising and I appreciate it use of modern tools for web app development.

Anthony Frank
Feature Request

Perplexity Integration

Most bugs stem from errors that are a quick Google search away from being fixed. Perplexity would eliminate this manual research.

Simon Bergeron
Feature Request

Ability to add screenshots in chat itself

The image upload feature is a great addition, allowing us to customize elements with our own visuals. However, its utility is limited when we need to communicate specific design adjustments, like fixing a layout issue. Currently, I can't effectively use the image upload to show Creatr what needs to be changed. For example, I recently encountered a CTA button that was too long. In other tools, I could simply take a screenshot, highlight the issue, and ask the AI to correct it. This visual communication is much more efficient than trying to describe the problem in words. The lack of this screenshot/annotation functionality makes it difficult to clearly convey these types of targeted edits within Creatr. Implementing this would significantly improve the workflow.

Krishna Goutham N
Feature Request

Clarity on Capabilities

I would appreciate a feature that provides clear indications of Creatrr's capabilities directly next to the project prompt window. This could be in the form of a toggle or a sidebar showing: Supported Languages: Creatrr can currently support these languages: X, Y, Z. Deployment Options: It can deploy to these web hostings: X, Y, Z. Database Support: It supports these databases and schemas: X, Y, Z. Prioritization for Development: Database Integration: A priority should be the integration of a database solution like Supabase or similar. My experience with bolt.new has highlighted the importance of not just building a web app but also having a functional database or the ability to link to a locally running database schema. This feature would significantly enhance the tool's utility. Ideas for Future Enhancements: Project Import and Marketplace: The ability to import projects from GitHub or have a marketplace where users can view, edit, and adjust projects created by others would foster a community of learning and innovation. This could serve as a platform for sharing best practices and innovative solutions. Positive Aspects: Error Handling: I'm impressed by how Creatrr handles errors. The AI's ability to attempt to solve issues before compiling, iterating to find where it's wrong without needing user interaction, is a standout feature. This proactive approach saves time and reduces frustration. User Interface: The UI is intuitive and visually appealing. The tabbed process view allows for a clear understanding of the development stages, making the app creation process transparent and manageable. AI Performance: The AI's performance in constructing applications, identifying errors, and suggesting fixes is commendable. It's evident that a lot of thought has gone into making the development process as smooth as possible. Overall, Creatrr is on the right track with its current capabilities, and with the suggested enhancements, it could become an even more powerful tool for developers looking to create applications without coding. Keep up the excellent work! I will be making a twitter thread about the experiences later my handle is @dehypokriet follow me to see it later, thankyou for allowing me the beta tests

Damian Bitel
Feature Request

Loving the experience with Creatr!

Some blocks gave me a bit of trouble, but overall it's working smoothly and helping me bring my ideas to life. Excited to build more!

Saukhya Sparsh
Feature Request

Very good job guys. RN 8/10 and i can see that in the future its will be 10/10

HALWLAW KING
Feature Request

Prompt Editing Experience in Creator

First off, I really appreciate the early access and the work you all are doing with Creator. It’s been great exploring the tool, and I can see how powerful it can be for UI generation. That said, there’s one usability issue I’ve come across that I wanted to share. Right now, I’ve noticed there’s no way to edit prompts after I’ve started working on them. Given that Creator functions as a chat UI where I can iteratively build and refine my UI, not being able to adjust previous prompts forces me to start from scratch whenever I need to make modifications. This breaks the workflow a bit and makes iteration less fluid than I’d like. Would love to hear your thoughts on whether this is something that could be improved in future updates.

Jaleel Bennett
Feature Request

Stripe + Webhooks

Seamless integration of your product with stripe using webhooks for advanced use-cases instead of just payment links.

prince
Feature Request

Promising ! - Improve SQL commands

1) I like it ! The work on the UX is very interesting. Even my cat likes the animations and it loves to watch me using Creatr ;) . AI API, Resend, Analytics integrations are a very good way to offer something different from Lovable. 2) I encountered problems though, regarding SQL commands : I feel like the Creatr doesn’t have full context of what is happening at the Supabase level. So when it creates a non correct SQL commands producing errors, it will try to correct itself but as it encounters bugs in Supabase, it will try to fix it at the frontend level, so it doesn’t work. A workaround I found is to copy the last produced SQL commands into the SQL editor in Supabase and debug the SQL commands with the Supabase AI. 3) My two cents recommandations : - Does the AI have access to the Supabase SQL console output ? - Does the AI have access to the Supabase Logs ? (Postgres, API Gateway, Auth, Pooler…) - As OpenAI is quite expensive per token, I would appreciate having access to Open Router API. - As Sonnet is not yet supported as API providers within our created app/website, would it be correct to assume that Sonnet 3.7 is not at work as the Creatr AI ? From my Websim.ai experience, Sonnet 3.7 is much better than the 3.5. Thank you for bringing this great product to life !

Luigi Le J.

Next up

Committed and queued

No Next up issues

In Progress

Actively being built

No In Progress issues

Done

1

Recently shipped